|
Detailed Reference Information |
Farrugia, C.J., Sandholt, P.E., Cowley, S.W.H., Southwood, D.J., Egeland, A., Stauning, P., Lepping, R.P., Lazarus, A.J., Hansen, T. and Friis-Christensen, E. (1995). Reconnection-associated auroral activity stimulated by two types of upstream dynamic pressure variations: Interplanetary magnetic field Bz ~ 0, By « 0 case. Journal of Geophysical Research 100: doi: 10.1029/95JA01082. issn: 0148-0227. |
|
We present observations of transient auroral activity in the 1300--1600 MLT range at geomagnetic latitudes of 76¿ and interpret them in terms of modulations in the reconnection rate at the magnetopause which are, in turn, stimulated by the arrival at Earth of upstream dynamic pressure pulses. The period studied is 1000--1200 UT on December 17, 1992. The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), monitored by IMP 8, was aligned in a Parker spiral direction with a strong westward component (IMF By≪0) and a small or zero north-south component. The upstream dynamic pressure variations were of two types, reflecting two distinct origins: the unperturbed solar wind and the bow shock. The underlying reconnection interpretation, with the necessary magnetic shear across the magnetopause being provided by the strong westward component of the IMF, is substantiated by a study of ionospheric flows. A twin-cell pattern of standard polarity is evident in which strong asymmetries about noon are seen, as expected from the predominantly westward pointing IMF. Flow perturbations are superimposed on this general pattern. The auroral observations consist of a latitudinally narrow zone of persistent auroral emission, at the poleward edge of which auroral forms are seen moving eastward (tailward) at speeds of 1--2 km s-1. This intermittent activity, which is often detached from the persistent aurora, has a red line intensity (line of sight)>1.5 kR, a broad intensity-versus-zenith angle profiles, and a weak green line intensity (20% increase relative to background levels) upstream dynamic pressure pulses. Smaller dynamic pressure changes do not seem to affect the aurora noticeably. Our interpretation is in line with some recent studies, namely, that an increase of dynamic pressure on the magnetopause enhances the reconnection rate there. Clearly, theoretical work is needed to understand this important, if indirect, effect of dynamic pressure on the magnetosphere. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1995 |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND DATA FILES |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
Keywords
Interplanetary Physics, Solar wind plasma, Magnetospheric Physics, Auroral phenomena, Magnetospheric Physics, Energetic particles, precipitating, Magnetospheric Physics, Solar wind/magnetosphere interactions |
|
Publisher
American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1277 USA 1-202-462-6900 1-202-328-0566 service@agu.org |
|
|
|