 |
Detailed Reference Information |
Vandas, M., Fischer, S., Pelant, P., Dryer, M., Smith, Z. and Detman, T. (1997). Propagation of a spheromak: 1. Some comparisons of cylindrical and spherical magnetic clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: doi: 10.1029/97JA02257. issn: 0148-0227. |
|
A series of our papers in the Journal of Geophysical Research, 1995--1996, was devoted to simulations of propagation of cylindrical magnetic clouds (flux ropes) having different orientation of their axes to the ecliptic plane and initial parameters. In this paper we supplement our study with the case of detached spherical plasmoids. By varying the velocity, density, temperature, and the magnetic field strength inside clouds, we simulate a number of plasmoid scenarios that can be compared with observations and with existing models and simulations of flux ropes. Initially, the spherical clouds have a poloidal magnetic field configuration within a sphere. During the propagation they evolve into toroids (i.e., closed flux ropes). Radial profiles of magnetic field and plasma quantities in these toroids are similar to cylindrical magnetic clouds. However, they are different in the central (now external) part of the cloud, where the poloidal axis was originally situated, that is, in the toroid's hole. Here the magnetic field is greatly enhanced but does not rotate, and the temperature decrease is absent. The deceleration and transit time to 1 AU is comparable between spherical and cylindrical clouds. The shock wave ahead of a spherical cloud is about 2 times closer than for a corresponding cylindrical cloud.¿ 1997 American Geophysical Union |
|
 |
 |
BACKGROUND DATA FILES |
|
 |
Abstract |
|
 |
|
|
|
Keywords
Interplanetary Physics, Ejecta, driver gases, and magnetic clouds, Interplanetary Physics, Interplanetary shocks, Space Plasma Physics, Turbulence |
|
Publisher
American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1277 USA 1-202-462-6900 1-202-328-0566 service@agu.org |
|
|
 |