EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Greenstadt et al. 1980
Greenstadt, E.W., Russell, C.T., Gosling, J.T., Bame, S.J., Paschmann, G., Parks, G.K., Anderson, K.A., Scarf, F.L., Anderson, R.R., Gurnett, D.A., Lin, R.P., Lin, C.S. and Rème, H. (1980). A macroscopic profile of the typical quasi-perpendicular bow shock: Isee 1 and 2. Journal of Geophysical Research 85: doi: 10.1029/JA085iA05p02124. issn: 0148-0227.

Field and particle properties of the bow shock recorded on November 5, 1977, identified earlier as stable features by comparison of Isee 1 and 2 data, are examined macroscopically. The extent to which the shock was in a 'typical' state is described, and multidiagnostic observations are combined to define the shock profile, which, in this known case, is reminiscent of composite portraits assembled from earlier studies. A foot, a principal wave front gradient, and a postfront overshoot characterized the magnetic field. Various particle measurements revealed corresponding structural elements, including a bimodal ion energy distributin whose two peaks were at roughly the solar wind streaming energy and 2 to 3 times the streaming energy. The electrons were thermalized before the principal sharp magnetic gradient; the ions were partially randomized at the gradient, but the ion thermalization process was not completed until long after the gradient was crossed. The second peak of the ion distribution represented a separate group of reflected particles upstream of the main magnetic gradient that retained its identity for an appreciable distance behind the front before being merged by thermalization into the general distribution. This separation group included a northward proton flux in front of, but not immediately behind, the front. The group ultimately became thermalized through a series of very regular oscillations. The decrease in solar wind bulk velocity at the fron exceeded the sum of that calculated from an idealized first-order model of the rise in potential opposing the flow, plus the proton heating, leaving proton reflection and wave radiation and dispersion as candidates to account for the discrepancy. Plasma wave activity, at ion acoustic frequencies, was most intense in the foot and at the front and appeared to be enhanced at the outer boundary of the reflected particles.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit