EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Scudder et al. 1986
Scudder, J.D., Mangeney, A., Lacombe, C., Harvey, C.C., Aggson, T.L., Anderson, R.R., Gosling, J.T., Paschmann, G. and Russell, C.T. (1986). The resolved layer of a collisionless, high ß, supercritical, quasi-perpendicular shock wave 1. Rankine-Hugoniot geometry, currents, and stationarity. Journal of Geophysical Research 91: doi: 10.1029/JA080i010p11019. issn: 0148-0227.

A comprehensive set of experimental observations of a high &bgr; (2.4), supercritical (Mf=3.8), quasi-perpendicular (&THgr;Bn 1~76¿) bow shock layer is presented, and its local geometry, spatial scales, and stationarity are assessed in a self-consistent Rankine-Hugoniot-constrained frame of reference. Included are spatial profiles of the ac and dc magnetic and electric fields, electron and proton fluid velocities, current densities, electron and proton number densities, temperatures, pressures, and partial densities of the reflected protons. The transformation of the apparent time scales to the actual spatial scales is performed with unprecedented accuracy. The observed layer profile is shown to be nearly phase standing and one dimensional in a Rankine-Hugoniot frame, empirically determined by the magnetofluid parameters outside the layer proper.

One or both of these properties appear to collapse at the time resolution of 1.5 s in the specific geometry considered in this study. Several pieces of evidence are used to show this stationarity: (1) the similarity of the average magnetic structures seen on the two ISEE spacecraft; (2) the close agreement between the electric currents directly determined from the plasma data and those inferred from the magnetic data assuming the layer is one dimensional and time stationary; (3) the close agreement of the empirically determined scale lengths of the most prominent substructures with those determined by numerical simulations and previous laboratory studies; (4) the close agreement between the theoretical Rankine-Hugoniot-determined normal plasma pressure jump and that of the observed electron and proton fluids. The resolved cross-field electrical currents (with empirical error estimates) are observed to peak within the main magnetic ramp at a level well below the first stabilization threshold for ion acoustic turbulence suggested for low &bgr; shocks by Galeev (1976); clear evidence is also provided for smaller parallel currents throughout the main ramp and overshoot, with a predominant sense as if the shock electric field has caused the lighter electrons to lead the ions along the local magnetic field direction. The width of the shock depends on what structures are used to define it. The upstream pedestal or ''foot'' is nearly two upstream ion skin depths wide, but the main magnetic ramp is only 1/5 the upstream ion skin depth and thus considerably smaller than ''conventional wisdom'' and most simulations. The ramp scale length is directly corroborated by current densities determined from the plasma instruments.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit