Particles of roughly magnetosheath energies precipitate at low altitudes throughout the dayside, in a band referred to as the cusp or cleft. Recently it has been suggested that the cusp proper is a more limited region of the cleft localized near noon, although the criteria for distinguishing between the two regions have been unclear. An investigation into the distinction between the low-altitude cusp and the cleft (with the latter herein identified as the ionospheric signature of the low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL)) was performed on both a statistical and a case study basis. One year of DMSP F7 electron and ion data, comprising in all 5609 individual dayside passes, was employed. It was found that the average energy of precipitating particles allows for a clear morphological distinction between the cusp proper and the cleft/LLBL. Often both regions are observed on a given pass at the same MLT, each with its own characteristic properties. The probability of observing the cusp was found to be sharply peaked at 1200 MLT, while the probability of observing the cleft/LLBL was near unity away from noon and had a minimum at noon. The cusp was found to be 0.8¿--1.1¿ magnetic latitude (MLAT) thick essentially independent of MLT, whereas the cleft was thinnest at noon and widened rapidly at local times away from noon. The ion number flux in the cusp was statistically 3.6 times higher than the cleft. The peak flux within the cusp was located on average closer to the equatorward than to the poleward boundary. Yearly average composite spectrograms of precipitation in the two regions as a function of local time show that the properties of the cusp change comparatively little with local time, but that the peak ion energy flux in the cleft increases smoothly from roughly magnetosheath values close to noon to about plasma sheet boundary layer values near 0600 MLT. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1988 |