EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Acuña et al. 1988
Acuña, M.H., Connerney, J.E.P. and Ness, N.F. (1988). Implications of the GSFC Q3 model for trapped particle motion. Journal of Geophysical Research 93: doi: 10.1029/88JA01146. issn: 0148-0227.

The adiabatic motion of energetic charged particles in the Uranian magnetosphere is studied by numerical computation of field geometric invariants associated with the GSFC Q3 magnetic field model. Comparison of the computed L shell values along the Voyager 2 trajectory with those associated with the Uranian satellites Ariel, Umbriel, and Miranda as a function of their orbital position allows the prediction of times and locations where absorption effects of charged particles should be observable. Systematic differences in the observed and predicted counting rate (flux) minima suggest that the ''age'' of an absorption event must be taken into account and that a better understanding of the particles' drift history is needed to explain the observed features. As a consequence of the large tilt of the dipole term with respect to the rotation axis, the Uranian moons sweep a large range of L shells during their orbital motion and occupy several different L minima defined in the text. Comparisons with previous results obtained from the offset tilted dipole model of Ness et al. (1986) yield a complex picture regarding the predicted and observed times for absorption signatures, depending on the minimum L value used for comparison. In spite of this complexity, a general pattern is evident in which the predicted locations for the absorption signatures fall inside (i.e., at smaller radial distances) the observed features, thus suggesting that radial diffusion effects as well as the drift history of the trapped particles must be taken into account to explain the energetic charged particle observations. It is thus expected that observed absorption signatures which are ''young'' with respect to the location of the absorbing body and the Voyager 2 spacecraft better reflect the geometry of the magnetic field.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Magnetospheric Physics, Planetary magnetospheres, Magnetospheric Physics, Energetic particles, precipitating, Magnetospheric Physics, Energetic particles, trapped, Magnetospheric Physics, Magnetosphere interactions with satellites and rings
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit