EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Dodson & McClelland-Brown 1980
Dodson, M.H. and McClelland-Brown, E. (1980). Magnetic blocking temperatures of single-domain grains during slow cooling. Journal of Geophysical Research 85: doi: 10.1029/JB085iB05p02625. issn: 0148-0227.

Acquisition of TRM by a cooling assemblage of identical monodomain grains involves a transition from superparamagnetic to blocked behavior over a narrow but indefinite range of temperature. Blocking temperature may, nevertheless, be precisely defined by comparing the blocked magnetization, after cooling, with the curve of equilibrium magnetization against temperature. At the blocking temperature TB the relaxation time &tgr; of the magnetization is of the same order as the cooling time constant ϑ, which is the time required for &tgr; to increase by a factor e. An approximate analytic solution of the differential equation for magnetization in a cooling system gives for TB: &egr;(TB)/kT=ln(1.78Cϑ) where &egr; is the activation energy for rotation of magnetic moments, k is Boltzmann's constant, and C is the frequency factor (~1010 Hz). Because &egr; varies with temperature, the cooling time constant ϑ is given by 1/ϑ ?d&egr;/dT-&egr;/TB)dT/dt. The 95% blocking interval is about 7.2ϑ. For steady cooling it is reasonable to assume ϑ to be constant through this interval; small deviations from constancy have a negligible effect upon TB. In small external fields the variable grain geometry to be found within a real assemblage can be incorporated in a parameter &egr;0, which is the activation energy at 0 ¿C. Curves of &egr;0 against TB for magnetite and hematite, at cooling rates from 6 ¿C per minute to 3 ¿C per million years, show that (1) a change in &egr;0 by a factor of 2 corresponds to 12 orders of magnitude change in cooling rate and (2) for a broad distribution of grain sizes a large proportion of the size range will acquire their magnetization within 100 ¿C--200 ¿C of the Curie point. Using these curves, blocking temperature in cooling assemblages can be related to laboratory demagnetization temperatures; the differences are greater at slower cooling rates and lower temperatures and tend to zero as the Curie temperature is approached. Intensity of magnetization should increase by a few percent for each order of magnitude decrease in cooling rate. Magnetization acquired at temperatures near the Curie point should dominate in a chemically homogenous monodomain assemblage with a broad spread of grain sizes. Possible tests of the theory and its application to the determination of cooling history are discussed.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit