Frequency-dependent regional wave attenuation is estimated for continental paths to the NORESS array in Norway. Regional Lg and Pn spectra from 186 events at ranges between 200 and 1400 km and local magnitudes between 1.1 and 4.8 are inverted for both seismic moment and apparent attenuation. The Lg spectra were inverted between 1 and 7 Hz, and the Pn spectra were inverted between 1 and 15 Hz. The method uses both the spectral and spatial decay of observed signal amplitudes to separate source and path contributions. The assumptions include the geometric spreading rate and the source spectrum to be uniquely defined by its long-period level. Most events considered have local magnitudes less than 3.0, so the source corner frequencies are near or beyond the upper limit of the inverted bandwidth. The Q results, particularly for Lg, are therefore not very sensitive to the details of our source parameterization. The inversion parameters are source moment (for each event), a constant relating corner frequency and moment for the entire data set, and two parameters describing a power law frequency dependence of Q in the region. For fixed source and spreading assumptions the inversion defines clear trade-offs among model parameters. These trade-offs are resolved by adding the constraint that the separately derived source parameters for Lg and Pn are consistent. The ''preferred'' estimates for the apparent attenuation are QLg(f )=560f0.26 and QPn( f )=325f0.48. These Q values correspond to assumed geometric spreading rates of r-0.5 for Lg and r-1.3 for Pn. For fixed Lg spreading, the Pn spreading rate is constrained by requiring that the relative Lg amplitude for earthquakes and explosions of the same moment be consistent with well-supported results from previous empirical studies. The relationship between the inverted seismic moment values and local magnitude is generally consistent with values from near-field studies. Since magnitude does not enter the inversion, this result lends considerable support to the derived Q models. Whatever the physical interpretation of the results, they certainly provide an accurate parameterization of observed amplitude spectra in this region. This is valuable for representing wave propagation in the region, and it provides important data for assessing the event monitoring capabilities of small regional networks. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1988 |