Continental flood basalts (CFB) are commonly said to form by direct melting of metasomatized lithospheric mantle, either during major lithospheric extension or when a mantle plume impinges on the base of the lithosphere. We tested these ideas in a thermomechanical model that combines lithospheric dynamics and mantle convection. Dry melting was assumed, and the proportions of melt from different source regions were monitored. In all cases, >96% of melt was found to come from asthenosphere or plume, with minimal amounts from continental lithosphere. During passive lithosphere extension the total amount of melt is small, and the proportion from the lithosphere is 100 km) and have high concentrations of both MgO (>20%) and incompatible trace elements (K2O~1%). The very low Nb and Ta concentrations in certain CFB cannot, however, be explained by this process. Ratios of Nb to elements such as La or U are lower in many flood basalts and picrites than in all likely source materials: they are almost as low as in most rocks from the continental crust, and they are far lower than in peridotites from the lithospheric or asthenospheric mantle. Another process must therefore fractionate Nb and Ta.

We suggest that this takes place during the passage of magma through the lithospheric mantle, perhaps because of differences in the reaction rates of minerals in metasomatized peridotite. The probability that CFB are hybrid magmas containing material from aesthenospheric and lithospheric mantle and in many cases from continental crust, as well as the possibility that some elemental ratios change during magma-lithosphere interaction, casts serious doubt on the reliability of such rocks as probes of the lithospheric mantle. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1992