EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Robertson et al. 1995
Robertson, M.C., Sammis, C.G., Sahimi, M. and Martin, A.J. (1995). Fractal analysis of three-dimensional spatial distributions of earthquakes with a percolation interpretation. Journal of Geophysical Research 100: doi: 10.1029/94JB02463. issn: 0148-0227.

Although many studies have shown that faults and fractures are self-similar over a large range of scales, none have tested the fault structure for self-similarity in three dimensions. In this study, earthquake hypocentral locations in central and southern California were used to illuminate three-dimensional (3-D) fault structures, for which we measured the fractal capacity dimension, Do(3-D). Hypocentral distributions from the Joshua Tree, Big Bear, and Upland aftershock sequences, as well as background seismicity at Parkfield were found to be fractal, where Do(3-D) increased with increasing event density, asymptotically approaching a stable value. The Joshua Tree data set stabilized at Do(3-D)=1.92¿0.02, the Parkfield data set asymptotically approached Do(3-D)=1.82, and the Big Bear data set approached Do(3-D)=2.01. As a test of the effects of location errors upon the measured value of Do(3-D), the Upland aftershock data were located with both the southern California Hadley and Kanamori (1977) (H-K) velocity model, and the more accurate Hauksson and Jones (1991) (H-J) velocity model. Events located with the H-K model asymptotically approached Do(3-D)=2.07, and events located with the H-J model approached Do(3-D)=1.79, suggesting that improved hypocentral locations may decrease the measured fractal dimension. One interpretation of our results of Do(3-D)≤2.0 for all of the hypocentral data is that earthquakes only occur on the ''percolation backbone'' of a fault network, i.e., the active part of the network that accommodates finite strain deformation (Sahimi et al., 1993). We show that a percolation model that allows for healing of previously broken bonds is consistent with this interpretation. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1995

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Seismology, Seismicity and seismotectonics
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit