EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR) -- Renne et al. 1998

The Ar-40/Ar-39 dating method depends on accurate intercalibration between samples, neutron fluence monitors, and primary Ar-40/K-40 (or other external) standards. The Ar-40/Ar-39 age equation may be expressed in terms of intercalibration factors that are simple functions of the relative ages of standards, or equivalently are equal to the ratio of radiogenic to nucleogenic K-derived argon (Ar-40*/Ar-39(K)) values far one standard or unknown relative to another. Intercalibration factors for McClure Mountain hornblende (MMhb-1), GHC-305 biotite, GA-1550 biotite, Taylor Creek sanidine (TCs) and Alder Creek sanidine (ACs), relative to Fish Canyon sanidine (FCs), were derived from 797 analyses involving II separate irradiations with well-constrained neutron fluence variations. Values of the intercalibration factors are R-FCs(MMhb-1) = 21.4876 +/- 0.0079; R-FCs(GA-1550) = 3.5957 +/- 0.0038; R-FCs(TCs) = 1.0112 +/- 0.0010; R-FCs(ACs) = 0.04229 +/- 0.00006, based on the mean and standard error of the mean resulting from four or more spatially distinct co-irradiations of FCs with the other standards. Analysis of 35 grains of GHC-305 irradiated in a single irradiation yields R-FCs(GHC-305) = 3.8367 +/- 0.0143. Results at these levels of precision essentially eliminate intercalibration as a significant source of error in Ar-40/Ar-39 dating. Data for GA-1550 (76 analyses, 5 fluence values), TCs (54 analyses, 4 fluence values), FCs (380 analyses, 40 fluence values) and ACs (86 analyses, II fluence values) yield MSWD values showing that the between-grain dispersion of Ar-40*/Ar-39(K) values is consistent with analytical errors alone, whereas MMhb-1 (167 analyses, 4 irradiations) and GHC-305 (34 analyses, 1 fluence value) are heterogeneous and therefore unsuitable as standards for small sample analysis. New K measurements by isotope dilution for two primary standards, GA-1550 biotite (8 analyses averaging 7.626 +/- 0.016 wt%) and intralaboratory standard GHC-305 (10 analyses averaging 7.570 +/- 0.011 wt%), yield values slightly lower and more consistent than previous data obtained by flame photometry, with resulting Ar-40/K-40 ages of 98.79 +/- 0.96 Ma and 105.6 +/- 0.3 Ma for GA-1550 and GHC-305, respectively. Combining these data with the intercalibration approach described herein and using GA-1550 as the primary standard (1.343 x 10(-9) mol/g of Ar-40*; [McDougall, I., Roksandic, Z., 1974. Total fusion Ar-40/Ar-39 ages using HIFAR reactor. J. Geol. Sec. Aust. 21, 81-89.]) yields ages of 523.1 +/- 4.6 Ma for MMhb-1, 105.2 +/- 1.1 Ma for GHC-305, 98.79 +/- 0.96 Ma for GA-1550, 28.34 +/- 0.28 Ma for TCs, 28.02 +/- 0.28 for FCs, and 1.194 +/- 0.012 Ma far ACs (errors are full external errors, including uncertainty in decay constants). Neglecting error in the decay constants, these ages End uncertainties are: 523.1 +/- 2.6 Ma for MMhb-1, 105.2 +/- 0.7 Ma for GHC-305, 98.79 +/- 0.54 for GA-1550, 28.34 +/- 0.16 Ma for TCs, 28.02 +/- 0.16 Ma for FCs, and 1.194 +/- 0.007 Ma for ACs. Using GHC-305 as the primary standard (1.428 +/- 0.004 x 10(-9) mol/g of Ar-40*), ages are 525.1 +/- 2.3 Ma for MMhb-1, 105.6 +/- 0.3 Ma for GHC-305, 99.17 +/- 0.48 Ma for GA-1550, 28.46 +/- 0.15 Ma for TCs, 28.15 +/- 0.14 Ma for FCs, and 1.199 +/- 0.007 Ma for ACs, neglecting decay constant uncertainties. The approach described herein facilitates error propagation that allows for straightforward inclusion of uncertainties in the ages of primary standards and decay constants, without which comparison of Ar-40/Ar-39 dates with data from independent geochronometers is invalid. Re-examination of K-40 decay constants would he fruitful for improved accuracy. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.