EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Cooper et al. 1976
Cooper, A.K., Marlow, M.S. and Scholl, D.W. (1976). Mesozoic magnetic lineations in the Bering Sea marginal basin. Journal of Geophysical Research 81: doi: 10.1029/JB081i011p01916. issn: 0148-0227.

A compilation of marine magnetic profiles from the Bering Sea marginal basin has revealed the existence of north-south trending magnetic lineations over the deep abyssal basins. The anomalies in the Aleutian and Bowers basins have maximum peak to peak amplitudes of 350 &ggr; and wavelengths characteristic of sea floor spreading anomalies (25--100 km). These lineations are as much as 600 km long. In contrast, linear trends within the Komandorsky Basin are less distinct and have anomalies with variable amplitudes. The magnetic anomalies along an 850-km profile crossing the Aleutian Basin have been correlated with the M1-M13 (117-132 m.y.) sequence of Larson's (1974) Mesozoic time scale. These anomalies increase in age from east to west and yield a half spreading rate of 5.1 cm/yr. North-south trending anomalies within Bowers Basin exhibit shapes and spacings similar to those from the Aleutian Basin, suggesting that these trends may have been connected at one time. Detailed model studies of the anomalies in the Aleutian Basin yield results which support the hypothesis that the igneous crust in the eastern Bering Sea is trapped oceanic plate which may have been part of the Mesozoic Pacific Basin. The model studies have indicated that (1) normalized magnetization intensities are comparable to those estimated for the Mesozoic Hawaiian Lineations in the Pacific, (2) the approximate phase angle of the observed anomalies (-10¿¿20¿) would allow the magnetic lineations either to be formed at their present location or else to be formed at a more southerly site and then moved to their present location, and (3) the width of transitions between adjacent polarity intervals is relatively large (W?16 km) and may be related to a redistribution of the remanent magnetization within a deeply buried layer 2. The corrected depth to layer 2 is within 5% of the depth predicted for Mesozoic crust (120 m.y.) on the Sclater (1972) depth versus age curves. Although the north-south trending anomalies in the Aleutian and Bowers basins are interpreted as sea floor spreading anomalies, the origin of the anomaly pattern in the Komandorsky Basin is not understood.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit