Comparisons are made between L and X band synthetic aperture radar images of frozen lakes on the North Slpe of Alaska and ground truth observations of the nature of their ice covers. It is shown that the differences in radar backscatter observed on different areas of a lake can be correlated with whether or not the lake is frozen completely to the bottom at the site in question. This explanation is reasonable inasmuch as the reflection coefficient associated with the high-dielectric contrast ice/water interface is significantly higher than that associated with a low-contrast ic/soil interface. However, the presence of the ice/water interface cannot be the only condition required for the higher backscatter because the ice/water interface per se would be specular at X and L band frequencies, causing the energy returned from the interface to be reflected away from the radar receiver. The other principal factor contributing to the return of energy from the ice?water interface to the receiver is believed to be the presence in the ice of numerous vertically elongated air bubbles which would act as scatters.