EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Merchant & Harris 1999
Merchant, C.J. and Harris, A.R. (1999). Toward the elimination of bias in satellite retrievals of sea surface temperature: 2. Comparison with in situ measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 104: doi: 10.1029/1999JC900106. issn: 0148-0227.

We test a new scheme for retrieving skin sea surface temperatures (SSTs) from brightness temperatures observed by the satellite-borne along-track scanning radiometer (ATSR). The main improvement is in the accuracy of SST retrievals using dual-view observations at 11 and 12 μm under conditions of high optical depth of stratospheric aerosol and high tropospheric water vapor loading. This is demonstrated by comparing 10 arc min average ATSR SSTs with in situ measurements of the Tropical Atmosphere Ocean (TAO) array of buoys between September 1991 and May 1992 (when volcanic aerosol was present in the stratosphere after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991). The 620 coincidences of ATSR and TAO SSTs are matched within 1 hour and ~20 km. The mean and standard deviation of the difference between satellite and in situ SSTs are -0.16 K and 0.37 K, respectively, compared to -1.39 K and 0.59 K, respectively, using the prelaunch scheme. Meteorological measurements recorded with most TAO SSTs allow calculation of skin SSTs, more suitable for comparison with the radiometric SSTs derived from ATSR. The bias and standard deviation compared to skin SST are +0.07 K and 0.27 K, respectively. About 5% of ATSR retrievals have errors which we attribute to residual cloud contamination. The robust standard deviation describing the uncontaminated data is 0.19 K. The aerosolrobustness of the new scheme is evident in the absence of any trend in SST error corresponding to the decay of the stratospheric aerosol loading (0.00¿0.16 K yr-1). The new scheme is shown to be unbiased by water vapor loadings between 20 and 60 kg m-2. The effects of matchup and buoy error and either skin-bulk variability or skin-bulk adjustment error contribute to the standard deviations given above, suggesting that the random retrieval errors intrinsic to use of the new coefficients are smaller still. ¿ 1999 American Geophysical Union

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Oceanography, General, Remote sensing and electromagnetic processes
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit