In recent efforts to predict the climatic impacts of tropical deforestation an extreme scenario of impoverished grassland has been used to represent the future deforested landscape. Currently, deforested areas of the tropics are composed of a mosaic of crops, bare soil, grassland, and secondary vegetation of various ages. The dominant feature of deforested land is often secondary vegetation. Parameter values for important forest replacement land covers, including secondary vegetation, have been shown to differ from those of forest much less than that assumed in general circulation model (GCM) deforestation experiments. For this study, the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS) is run in uncoupled mode using measured input data in place of GCM forcing and using the same parameter settings employed in recent deforestation experiments. Model output is compared with measurements taken over seven different deforested land surfaces in northern Thailand. Comparisons reveal that the simulation of deforested land overestimates reflected shortwave radiation, the diurnal range of surface temperature for secondary vegetation, surface soil moisture loss during periods without rain, and surface soil moisture increase at the start of a rainy period and underestimates net radiation, the diurnal range of surface temperature on recently used land surfaces, and root zone soil moisture increase at the start of a rainy period at most sites. Most deforested land surfaces, especially intermediate and advanced secondary vegetation, are more similar, in terms of land surface-atmosphere interaction, to the model simulation of forest than of deforested land as depicted in GCM experiments. These comparisons suggest that modelers aspiring to make realistic simulations of deforestation should adopt parameter settings representative of the diverse range of forest replacement land covers, instead of again using the grassland scenario. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1996