EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Hide et al. 1997
Hide, R., Dickey, J.O., Marcus, S.L., Rosen, R.D. and Salstein, D.A. (1997). Atmospheric angular momentum fluctuations during 1979–1988 simulated by global circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: doi: 10.1029/97JD00699. issn: 0148-0227.

Changes in major global dynamical phenomena in the Earth's atmosphere are manifested in the time series of atmospheric angular momentum (AAM), as determined directly from meteorological observations and indirectly from geodetic observations of small fluctuations in the rotation of the solid Earth which are proportional to length of day. AAM fluctuations are intimately linked with energetic processes throughout the whole atmosphere and also with the stresses at the Earth's surface produced largely by turbulent momentum transport in the oceanic and continental boundary layers and by the action of normal pressure forces on orographic features. A stringent test of any numerical global circulation model (GCM) is therefore provided by a quantitative assessment of its ability to represent AAM fluctuations on all relevant timescales, ranging from months to several years. From monthly data provided by the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) of the World Climate Research Programme, we have investigated seasonal and interannual fluctuations and the decadal mean in the axial component of AAM in 23 AMIP GCMs over the period 1979--1988. The decadal means are generally well simulated, with the model median value (1.58¿1026 kg m2 s-1) being only 3.5% larger than the observed mean and with 10 of the models being within 5% of the observed. The seasonal cycle is well reproduced, with the median amplitude of the models' seasonal standard deviations being only 2.4% larger than observed. Half the seasonal amplitudes lie within 15% of the observed, and the median correlation found between the observed and model seasonal cycles is 0.95. The dominant seasonal error is an under-estimation of AAM during northern hemisphere winter associated with errors in the position of subtropical jets. Less robust are the modeled interannual variations, although the median correlation of 0.61 between model simulations and observed AAM is statistically significant. The two El Ni¿o-Southern Oscillation events that occurred during the AMIP decade 1979--1988 have the expected positive AAM anomalies, although the AAM signature of the 1982--1983 event tends to be underestimated and that of the 1986--1987 event overestimated.¿ 1997 American Geophysical Union

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Geodesy and Gravity, Rotational variations, Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics, General circulation, Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics, General or miscellaneous
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit