EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Lumpe et al. 1997
Lumpe, J.D., Bevilacqua, R.M., Hoppel, K.W., Krigman, S.S., Kriebel, D.L., Debrestian, D.J., Randall, C.E., Rusch, D.W., Brogniez, C., Ramananahérisoa, R., Shettle, E.P., Olivero, J.J., Lenoble, J. and Pruvost, P. (1997). POAM II retrieval algorithm and error analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research 102: doi: 10.1029/97JD00906. issn: 0148-0227.

We present a detailed discussion of the version 5 algorithms used to analyze the Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement II (POAM II) solar occultation data. As this version is primarily an ozone and aerosol retrieval, the scope of the paper is limited to these constituents. Forward model algorithms for calculating atmospheric transmittance in the nine POAM II spectral channels are presented, as well as detailed instrument simulation models used to generate synthetic data. Inversion of POAM II data is accomplished in two sequential steps, using the method of optimal estimation. A nonlinear spectral inversion is performed first, which simultaneously inverts the measured slant optical depth profiles in all channels to obtain the separate gas and aerosol optical depth components. Inversion of the slant path line of sight integral then yields altitude profiles of constituent density and aerosol extinction. Examples of both real and simulated retrievals are presented, and comparisons are made between retrievals obtained with the version 5 operational algorithm and an independent algorithm developed at the Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosph¿rique, University of Lille, Lille, France. A detailed error analysis is also presented, providing estimates of the total random and systematic error budget for the ozone and aerosol retrievals. The results of this analysis indicate random errors of 5% or less in the ozone retrievals in the 10- to 50-km range. Random errors in the retrieved aerosol extinction are estimated to be 10 to 20% in the primary 1060-nm channel, increasing to 20 to 30% at 352 nm. Total systematic errors are estimated to be less than 5% for ozone and as much as 10 to 15% in the 1060-nm aerosol extinction and are primarily caused by systematic biases in the National Center for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) temperatures used in the analysis. Analysis of the retrieval averaging kernels shows that under present aerosol loading conditions, aerosol feedback into the ozone retrievals introduces biases of less than 2% at all altitudes.¿ 1997 American Geophysical Union

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Middle atmosphere—composition and chemistry, Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Instruments and techniques, Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801), Global Change, Instruments and techniques
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit