EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Parthasarathy et al. 1988
Parthasarathy, B., Diaz, H.F. and Eischeid, J.K. (1988). Prediction of all-India summer monsoon rainfall with regional and large-scale parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research 93. doi: 10.1029/88JD01658. issn: 0148-0227.

Using multiple regression, several statistical models were developed to predict Indian monsoon rainfall from conditions antecedent to the start of the monsoon season (defined as the period June--September). The predictors were selected in a stepwise fashion from a set of 11 predictors. These predictors were in turn chosen from a larger pool of 31 potential predictors on the basis of the strength of their correlation with all-India rainfall and on whether the predictor variable exhibited a significant difference in predictor mean values between wet (seasonal rainfall exceeding one standard deviation from the long-term mean) and dry (seasonal rainfall lower than one standard deviation below the mean) years over the period 1951--1980. The models account for between 70 and 83% of the interannual variance of all-India rainfall depending on the calibration period. The regressions were tested on sets of independent years. In these trials the amount of predictand (rainfall) variance realized varied from near zero to near 60% depending on the period. The models with the highest skill (except one) actually included data from years prior to the calibration period.

Hence, these models were really performing ''hindcasts,'' and as such would be useful only in a diagnostic rather than a prognostic mode. However, the sliding calibration model, where the regression coefficients are recalculated annually did show some predictive skill. Many of the model predictors, such as the mean April latitude of the 500-mbar ridge over India have been previously identified in the work of other investigators. New predictors, such as the preceeding winter to spring sea level pressure change at Bombay, India, which was a leading predictor in all the models, could alone account for 50--60% of the predictand variance. The latitudinal position of the 500-mbar ridge axis in April along 75 ¿E longitude was generally the second predictor to be entered. The regression model based on the earliest development sample (1951--1970), however, had the Southern Oscillation Index of Tahiti-Darwin winter-to-spring sea level pressure tendency as its number two predictor. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1988

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics, Tropical meteorology, Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics, Climatology, Meteorology and Atmospheric Dynamics, Precipitation
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit