Total ozone and ozone profiles are currently being measured by solar backscatter ultraviolet (SBUV/2) instruments onboard NOAA polar orbiting spacecraft using the backscattered ultraviolet technique. The NOAA 11 SBUV/2 operational data set was reprocessed from January 1989 to May 1993 and is now called version 6. The version 6 data include an updated algorithm and revised prelaunch and postlaunch calibrations of the geometrical albedo observations used to derive ozone values. Only the calibration revisions are described in this paper. The postlaunch revisions remove time dependent errors in the ozone amounts due to instrument drift, while the revised prelaunch calibration corrects the absolute value of retrieved ozone. The prelaunch corrections are a result of calibration checks from in-orbit comparisons of ultraviolet geometric albedos measured by shuttle SBUV (SSBUV) and the NOAA 11 SBUV/2. Geometric albedo comparisons data are further corrected using a radiative transfer code to account for the small difference in observing conditions between the two spacecraft. The postlaunch corrections rely on in-flight calibration and solar irradiance data to account for time dependent changes in instrument gain, thermal response, and instrument diffuser degradation over time.

Comparison of data from three SSBUV flights, which occurred about one year apart, with concurrent SBUV/2 data provided an independent check of the time dependent change derived from the in-flight calibration data. Time independent corrections result in an increase of about 1% for total ozone, 5% for ozone at 1 mbar, and near 0% at 15 mbar. The time dependent corrections amount to an increase of 2% for total ozone, 10% for ozone near 1 mbar, and 3% at 15 mbar at the end of the current record in May 1993. Recent laboratory studies indicate that the absolute radiance calibrations may still be in error by a few percent which results in ozone profile values that are too low. The SBUV/2 total and ozone profile data are compared to the Nimbus SBUV data during the period when the data overlapped. Total ozone values agree to about 1%, while ozone profile differences range from -4% to +6%, depending on latitude and altitude, relative to SBUV. These differences are not statistically significant given the uncertainties of the two data sets. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1995