We present a compilation of 18 published models from the length of the Great Valley forearc basin, California, based on seismic reflection, borehole, seismic refraction, gravity, and aeromagnetic data to address long-standing questions about the nature of the basement to the Great Valley, its origin, its tectonic history, and it's mechanism of incorporation into the North American continental margin. The geophysical models permit a 700-km-long, 70-km-wide, complete ophiolite sequence beneath the entire Great Valley. In the northern Great Valley, the ophiolite is overlain by ophiolitic breccia, the ophiolite crust is 7--8 km thick, and the mantle section is mostly unserpentinized. Beneath the southern Great Valley, there is no ophiolitic breccia, the crust may be up to 10--12 km thick, and the mantle section, if present at all, is serpentinized to such a degree that it cannot be distinguished from Sierran basement or mafic ophiolite members on the basis of velocity or density data. Geochemical, petrological, and paleomagnetic data support suprasubduction zone ophiolite formation at North American paleolatitudes, and geological data and geophysical models are consistent with ophiolite formation by back are spreading behind an east facing arc. In the north, this was apparently followed by obduction of back arc crust onto older continental basement during the Late Jurassic Nevadan orogeny. In the south, the newly formed intraoceanic arc and back arc apparently collided with the continental margin during the Nevadan orogeny but were not obducted onto it. Instead, the arc and back arc docked with the continental margin leaving the arc itself to become the basement to the Great Valley basin. Cretaceous Sierran magmatism then intruded plutons beneath the docked ophiolite and mafic arc. Irrespective of the detailed accretionary history, our cross sections show a rapid pulse of continental growth by ophiolite accretion of more than 500 km3 km-1 in less than 10 Myr. ¿ 1998 American Geophysical Union