Hydraulic tests conducted in low-permeability media are subject to numerous influences and processes, many of which manifest in a nonunique fashion. To explore the accuracy and meaning of the interpretation of hydraulic tests conducted under such conditions, two semianalytical models are developed in which variable well bore storage, variable temperature, and test method are considered. The formation is assumed to be of uniform permeability and uniform storativity in both models. To investigate uncertainty in the use of these models, a comparison is conducted to similar models that account for nonuniform formation properties such as finite skin, double porosity, and fractional flow. Using the models for a finite skin and double porosity as baseline cases, results show that the interpretation of slug tests are normally nonunique when tests are conducted in material of low permeability. Provided that a lower bound is defined for storativity, the uncertainty in a given interpretation conducted with the model for a uniform medium can be established by comparison with a fit to the data obtained using the model incorporating finite skin. It was also found that the degree of uncertainty can be diminished by conducting the test using an open hole period followed by a shut-in period (similar to a drill stem test). Determination of the degree of uncertainty was found to be case specific and must be defined by using at least a comparison between the model for uniform media and that for finite skin. To illustrate the use of the slug test model and determine the degree of uncertainty that will accrue with the use of that model, a field example, potentially influenced by variable well bore storage, is presented and interpreted.¿ 1997 American Geophysical Union