Current confluence research emphasizes three broad controls on flow structure generation: (1) planform curvature; (2) topographic steering; and (3) anisotropic turbulence associated with flow separation and shear layer dynamics. The relative importance of these processes in explaining observed flow structures is controversial, a situation that may be related to the fact that different investigators have examined different confluence configurations. This paper uses a three-dimensional numerical model, with a fully elliptic solution, a free surface treatment, and a turbulence model based on a renormalized group (RNG) to help to provide a physically based explanation of the controls upon flow structure generation for both a laboratory (rectangular) and a field confluence (the confluence of the Kaskaskia River and Copper Slough) and to identify the particular conditions under which particular flow structures are observed. Results suggest that an analogy with back-to-back meanders is possible for symmetrical configurations but that there will be progressive divergence from this state as confluence asymmetry increases. In asymmetric situations a dual-cell structure may be limited to the immediate vicinity of the junction because of the effects of streamline curvature and topographic steering. These differences can be explained by consideration of the dynamic pressure field, which may be specific to each confluence configuration. As such, this study partially reconciles differing views over what controls time-averaged flow structures in river channel confluences, although further research into the interaction of these processes with instantaneous velocity fluctuations is required. ¿ 2000 American Geophysical Union