EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
van Westrenen et al. 2003
van Westrenen, W., Van Orman, J.A., Watson, H., Fei, Y. and Watson, E.B. (2003). Assessment of temperature gradients in multianvil assemblies using spinel layer growth kinetics. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 4. doi: 10.1029/2002GC000474. issn: 1525-2027.

We present an empirical equation to link the thickness of a MgAl2O4 spinel layer growing at the interface between MgO and Al2O3 multianvil high-pressure assembly pieces to pressure (P), temperature (T), and time (t), extending the recent study of Watson et al. <2002> to the pressure range 6--16 GPa and temperature range 1673--2273 K. For the spinel thickness ΔX we obtain$Delta X left( mu {rm m} right) = sqrt { left( 5.3 pm 0.3 right) cdot 10^{8} cdot exp left( - displaystylefrac{ left( 33200 pm 2118 right) + left( 1424 pm 75 right) cdot P left( {rm GPa} right) } { T left(rm K right) } right) cdot t left( {rm s} right) }. $This equation can be used to assess the thermal gradient in any multianvil assembly where MgO and Al2O3 filler pieces are in contact at P-T conditions within the MgAl2O4 spinel stability field. As an illustration, we show that the central hot spot, in which temperatures can be considered constant, is close to 1 mm long in a common octahedral multianvil assembly with 8 mm edge length and rhenium furnace, while it extends to 3 mm long in an octahedron with 18 mm edge length using a straight graphite heating element. In addition, we present the results of a spinel growth experiment performed at 2273 K and 15 GPa with 18O enriched MgO, which shows that oxygen is mobile at a length scale exceeding that of the spinel layer. This finding raises the possibility that under some circumstances growth of spinel (and of reaction-product layers in other oxide systems) might be accomplished by concurrent fluxes of oxygen and cations. This mobile oxygen model differs from the more conventional Mg-Al exchange model proposed by Watson and Price <2002> for the lower-pressure experiments and might explain the observed differences in systematics between the high- and low-pressure data sets.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Mineralogy and Petrology, Experimental mineralogy and petrology, Mineralogy and Petrology, Instruments and techniques
Journal
Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit