|
Detailed Reference Information |
Rixen, M., Allen, J.T., Alderson, S., Cornell, V., Crisp, N., Fielding, S., Mustard, A.T., Pollard, R.T., Popova, E.E., Smeed, D.A., Srokosz, M.A., Barth, A. and Beckers, J.-M. (2003). Along or across front survey strategy? An operational example at an unstable front. Geophysical Research Letters 30: doi: 10.1029/2002GL015341. issn: 0094-8276. |
|
We present results of the optimization of near-real time on-board sampling strategy in the Iceland-Faroes oceanic frontal area, based on the outputs of a mesoscale 3D operational data assimilation forecasting experiment. By minimizing a root mean square error cost function, we show that in this example an along-front sampling strategy, i.e. with transects parallel to the front, produces smaller errors in temperature, salinity, nitrate, phytoplankton, and zooplankton fields, as a result of a combination of the direction of the sampling of the front and errors associated with the asynopticy of observations (Doppler effect). This is contrary to the classic across-front sampling strategies that are used in most field experiments reported in the literature, i.e. where transects are perpendicular to the front. A control model shows that at these spatio-temporal scales, the along front sampling strategy is optimal when the frontal instability has sufficiently developed. |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND DATA FILES |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
Keywords
Oceanography, General, Ocean prediction, Oceanography, Physical, Eddies and mesoscale processes, Oceanography, Physical, Fronts and jets, Oceanography, Biological and Chemical, Modeling |
|
Publisher
American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1277 USA 1-202-462-6900 1-202-328-0566 service@agu.org |
|
|
|