EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Emardson et al. 2003
Emardson, T.R., Simons, M. and Webb, F.H. (2003). Neutral atmospheric delay in interferometric synthetic aperture radar applications: Statistical description and mitigation. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: doi: 10.1029/2002JB001781. issn: 0148-0227.

Variations in the refractive index of the atmosphere cause variations in satellite-based interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) observations. We can mitigate tropospheric effects by averaging N-independent interferograms. Because the neutral atmosphere is uncorrelated at timescales longer than 1 day, using this technique statistically reduces the variance, σ2, of the noise by a factor of N. Using zenith neutral atmospheric delays from Global Positioning System (GPS) data from the Southern California Integrated GPS Network, we find that the average variance depends on the distance between observations, L, and height difference, H, as σ = c Lα + kH with estimated values for c, α, and k of about 2.5, 0.5, and 4.8, respectively, where σ is in mm and L and H are in km. We expect that the value of α is largely site-independent but the value of c will depend on the water vapor variability of the area of interest. This model is valid over a range of L between approximately 10 and 800 km. Height differences between 0 and 3 km have been used in this analysis. For distances of 100 and 10 km with negligible height differences, σ is estimated to be approximately 25 and 8 mm, respectively. For a given orbit revisit time and image archive duration, we calculate the number and duration (assumed constant) of interferograms required to achieve a desired sensitivity to deformation rate at a given length scale. Assuming neutral atmosphere is the dominant source of noise, a 30¿ look angle, and an image revisit time of 7 days, detection of a deformation rate of 1 mm yr-1 over distances of 10 km requires about 2.2 years of continuous observations. Given our results, we suggest a data covariance structure to use when using InSAR data to constrain geophysical models.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Geodesy and Gravity, Crustal movements--interplate, Geodesy and Gravity, Crustal movements--intraplate, Geodesy and Gravity, Space geodetic surveys, Geodesy and Gravity, Standards and absolute measurements, Geodesy and Gravity, Instruments and techniques
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit