EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Schaap et al. 2004
Schaap, M., Van Der Gon, H.A.C.D., Dentener, F.J., Visschedijk, A.J.H., Van Loon, M., ten Brink, H.M., Putaud, J.-P., Guillaume, B., Liousse, C. and Builtjes, P.J.H. (2004). Anthropogenic black carbon and fine aerosol distribution over Europe. Journal of Geophysical Research 109: doi: 10.1029/2003JD004330. issn: 0148-0227.

We present a model simulation for the year 1995 accounting for primary particles, which are an important component of fine aerosols over Europe. A new emission inventory for black carbon (BC) was developed on the basis of the recent European emission inventory of anthropogenic primary particulate matter (Coordinated European Programme on Particulate Matter Emission Inventories, Projections and Guidance (CEPMEIP)). The annual BC emissions of Europe and the former Soviet Union for 1995 are estimated at 0.47 and 0.26 Tg C, respectively, with highest contributions from transport (off-road and on-road) and households. Modeled BC concentrations range from ≤0.05 ¿g/m3 in remote regions to more than 1 ¿g/m3 over densely populated areas. The modeled BC concentration is about 25% of the total primary aerosol concentration. The primary aerosol fields were combined with previously calculated secondary aerosol concentrations to obtain an estimate of the total anthropogenic fine aerosol distribution. Modeled BC levels contribute only 4--10% to fine aerosol mass, whereas sulphate and nitrate contribute 25--50 and 5--35%, respectively. Comparison with experimental data revealed that the model underestimates PM2.5 levels, mostly caused by the underprediction of total carbonaceous material (BC and OC) by a factor of ~2. The underestimation can partly be explained by the influence of local emissions, measurement uncertainties, natural sources, and representation of wet deposition. However, the uncertainties associated with the emission inventory for BC (and total PM) may be the most important cause for the discrepancy. In comparison with previous studies, our BC emission estimate is a factor of 2 lower, caused by the choice of more recent emission factors. Therefore a better knowledge of emission factors is urgently needed to estimate the BC (and PM) emissions reliably.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801), Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Pollution—urban and regional, Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Troposphere—composition and chemistry, Atmospheric Composition and Structure, Constituent sources and sinks, Information Related to Geographic Region, Europe, black carbon, PM2.5, particle emissions, aerosol composition, LOTOS, Europe
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit