|
Detailed Reference Information |
Light, A. and Bartlein, P.J. (2005). Reply [to “Comment on ‘Color schemes for improved data graphics,” by A. Light and P.J. Bartlein”]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 86: doi: 10.1029/2005EO200006. issn: 0096-3941. |
|
By calling attention to the perception of data graphics among color-impaired readers, we hoped to raise awareness of an even more prevalent phenomenonc the misuse of spectral, or rainbow, color schemes. David B. Stephenson is quite right regarding the incidence of different forms of color-vision impairment, which varies among racial and ethnic groups and is much lower for females . Our feature highlighted simulations of the less common protanopia to dramatize the general peril of spectral schemes. Figure 1 shows simulations of spectral, diverging, and progressive color schemes as they might appear to readers with either of the most common forms of color deficiency. Figures 1a and 1b illustrate why the adage red and green should never be seen is a good one. The simulations in the right-hand column show how deuteranopes may find it difficult or impossible to distinguish between red and green. |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND DATA FILES |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
Keywords
Computational Geophysics, Data presentation and visualization, Computational Geophysics, Image processing, General or Miscellaneous, Techniques applicable in three or more fields |
|
Journal
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
|
Publisher
American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1277 USA 1-202-462-6900 1-202-328-0566 service@agu.org |
|
|
|