|
Detailed Reference Information |
Wang, Z. (2005). Reply to Comment by T. L Holzer [on “Comparison between probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and flood frequency analysis”]. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 86: doi: 10.1029/2005EO330005. issn: 0096-3941. |
|
Risk discussed by Wang and Ormsbee <2005> may differ from that of Holzer. Although there are some different definitions of risk among different professions, it is quantified by three termsc probability, hazard (loss or others), and exposure. For example, in health sciences, risk is defined as the probability of gettingcancer if an average daily dose of a hazardous substance (hazard) is taken over a 70-year lifetime (exposure). In the financial world, risk is defined as the probability of losing a certain amount of money (loss) over a period of time. Wang and Ormsbee defined seismic risk as the probability of a structure being damaged one or more times (at least once) in t years (exposure) by an earthquake or ground motion (hazard) generated by the earthquake.This definition is consistent with that of Cornell <1968>. This is also consistent with those used in building codes, such as the International Building Code <ICC, 2000>. |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND DATA FILES |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
Keywords
Seismology, Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology, Seismology, Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction (1217, 1242) |
|
Journal
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
|
Publisher
American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1277 USA 1-202-462-6900 1-202-328-0566 service@agu.org |
|
|
|