EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Lee et al. 2005
Lee, D.-Y., Lyons, L.R. and Reeves, G.D. (2005). Comparison of geosynchronous energetic particle flux responses to solar wind dynamic pressure enhancements and substorms. Journal of Geophysical Research 110. doi: 10.1029/2005JA011091. issn: 0148-0227.

Geosynchronous energetic particle fluxes are used to examine the differences and similarities between the particle disturbances due to an enhancement in solar wind dynamic pressure Pdyn and those caused by substorms. Disturbances are also distinguished by IMF conditions. First, for not strongly southward IMF conditions (weakly southward or northward IMF), we find that the magnetospheric compression by a Pdyn enhancement usually causes particle fluxes to increase simultaneously at all energy channels. The increase is global around the Earth, but it usually occurs first on the dayside and then propagates to the nightside within a few minutes. We also find that a magnetospheric compression sometimes leads to a flux decrease or no flux change for at least one energy channel at some MLTs, which we attribute to the shape of radial profiles at constant adiabatic invariants. However, we find no evidence for substorm-like injections in our Pdyn enhancement events when the IMF is not strongly southward. Following prolonged strongly southward IMF, substorms caused by IMF changes that lead to convection electric field reduction and are not associated with a Pdyn change generate flux disturbances that are quite similar to typical substorm flux disturbances for less strongly southward IMF conditions. However, the dispersionless injection front is found over a much wider azimuthal region, sometimes extending to the late afternoonside for protons. We find that under prolonged steady, strongly southward IMF conditions, a Pdyn enhancement leads to a two-mode type disturbance. The disturbance due to magnetospheric compression can be clearly identified and is seen primarily on the dayside, and a substorm-like injection associated with current wedge formation is seen on the nightside. The dayside compression effect is seen in both species, but is often more easily identified in the proton fluxes than in the electron fluxes. The substorm-like injection feature is also seen in both species but is usually more evident in the electron fluxes. In the events studied here, the dayside compression disturbance precedes the substorm-like injection on the nightside by a few minutes.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Magnetospheric Physics, Solar wind/magnetosphere interactions, Magnetospheric Physics, Energetic particles, trapped, Magnetospheric Physics, Substorms, Magnetospheric Physics, Magnetic storms and substorms, energetic particle injection, substorm injection, sawtooth, storm, dynamic pressure
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit