EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Ellwood 1984
Ellwood, B.B. (1984). Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility: Empirical evaluation of instrumental precision. Geophysical Research Letters 11: doi: 10.1029/GL011i007p00645. issn: 0094-8276.

Measurement of the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) in rock specimens is complicated when magnitude differences between two of the three principal susceptibilities which are conventionally used in defining the susceptibility ellipsoid approach the precision limits of the instrument used. To evaluate this problem, the precision is reported for 5 replicate measurements of low field AMS in 34 samples (including diamagnetic samples) with susceptibilities ranging between 5.73¿10-3 and 2.94¿10-5 in mass SI units using a torsion fiber magnetometer. (These samples are available upon request for interlaboratory calibration.) Precision appears to be controlled by the within-sample axial susceptibility ratios and not by the susceptibility magnitudes. It is observed for the instruments used in this study that when the axial ratios (&khgr;a/&khgr;c or &khgr;b/&khgr;c) are equal to or less than 1.002, then the replicate precision for those axes is poor. When the axial ratios are greater than 1.005, then the precision is excellent. Such replicate AMS measurements for any given instrument provide an empirical means to determine a practical method for rejecting AMS data that are not sufficiently anisotropic for reliable measurement.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
http://www.agu.org/journals/gl/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit