|
Detailed Reference Information |
Kumar, M. (2006). Panel Reviews NASA Science Plan. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 87: doi: 10.1029/2006EO400005. issn: 0096-3941. |
|
The draft science plan of the NASA Science Mission Directorate lacks a clear strategy, and the agency may need to either abandon flagship missions or the ability to execute a balanced program due to rising costs, according to a 15 September report by the U.S. National Research Council. |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND DATA FILES |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
Keywords
Public Issues, Science policy, Public Issues, Funding, Policy Sciences, System operation and management |
|
Journal
Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union |
|
Publisher
American Geophysical Union 2000 Florida Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-1277 USA 1-202-462-6900 1-202-328-0566 service@agu.org |
|
|
|