EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Potter 2006
Potter, D.K. (2006). Quantifying transdomain transitions in three dimensions and the limits of classical and metastable single-domain behavior using field-impressed magnetic anisotropy. Journal of Geophysical Research 111: doi: 10.1029/2006JB004571. issn: 0148-0227.

Some domain imaging studies have been used as evidence for transdomain transitions and metastable single-domain states in particles larger than theoretical single-domain (SD) size. Domain imaging has certain limitations since observations are made of a two-dimensional surface, which is generally polished and may introduce stress effects, and usually a relatively small number of particles are analyzed. The present paper shows how field-impressed anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility provides independent quantitative support in three dimensions for transdomain transitions and metastable SD states. In particular, changes from positive to negative impressed anisotropy (prolate to oblate impressed ellipsoids) in a direct field (DF) of increasing strength are consistent with some small multidomain (MD) particles undergoing transitions to metastable SD states. The results suggest that DF treatment can quantify the particle size limits of metastable SD behavior. In contrast, an alternating field (AF) should not produce a metastable SD state in particles greater than theoretical SD size and experimentally produces positive impressed anisotropy in MD particles and negative values only in intrinsic SD particles. Consequently, AF treatment can be used to determine the particle size limits of theoretical classical (not metastable) SD behavior. Consistent results were obtained for particle size fractions of magnetite, titanomagnetite, pyrrhotite, and hematite. The results may also help to explain recent observations concerning the low-field variation of AC susceptibility of various minerals. Field-impressed anisotropy is a quantitative, rapid, three-dimensional technique, requiring no extra sample preparation (thus not introducing stress effects), and representative of a statistically large number of particles.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Keywords
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, Rock and mineral magnetism, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, Magnetic fabrics and anisotropy, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, Magnetic mineralogy and petrology, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, Instruments and techniques, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, General or miscellaneous
Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit