BACKGROUND: Evans and Heller (2003), Chapter 3.
An essential part of every paleomagnetic study is a discussion of what is carrying the magnetic remanence and how the rocks got magnetized. For this, we need some knowledge of what the important natural magnetic phases are, how to identify them, how they formed, and what their magnetic behavior is. In this chapter, we will cover a brief description of geologically important magnetic phases. Useful magnetic characteristics of important minerals can be found in Table 6.1 at the end of this chapter.
Iron is by far the most abundant transition element in the solar system, so most paleomagnetic studies depend on the magnetic iron bearing minerals: the iron-nickels (which are particularly important for extra-terrestrial magnetic studies), the iron-oxides such as magnetite, maghemite and hematite, the iron-oxyhydroxides such as goethite and ferrihydrite, and the iron-sulfides such as greigite and pyrrhotite. We are concerned here with the latter three as iron-nickel is very rare in terrestrial paleomagnetic studies.
The minerals we will be discussing are mostly solid solutions which the American Heritage dictionary defines as:
A homogeneous crystalline structure in which one or more types of atoms or molecules may be partly substituted for the original atoms and molecules without changing the structure.
In iron oxides, titanium commonly substitutes for iron in the crystal structure. Because the titanium ion Ti4+ has no unpaired spins (see Chapter 3) and is a different size, the magnetic properties of titano-magnetite are different from magnetite with no titanium.
Two solid solution series are particularly important in paleomagnetism: the ulv�spinel-magnetite and ilmenite-hematite series. Both titanomagnetites and hemoilmenites crystallize at about 1300∘C. Above about 600∘C, there is complete solid solution between magnetite and ulv�spinel and above about 800∘C between hematite and ilmenite. This means that all compositions are “allowed” in the crystal structure at the crystallization temperature. As the temperature decreases, the thermodynamic stability of the crystals changes. If a mineral has a given composition, say 60% titanium substitution (green dot in Figure 6.1a), when the temperature cools to intersect the red line, that composition is no longer thermodynamically stable and the two phases to either side are the equilibrium compositions. By 400∘C the two equilibrium phases are ~0.25 and ~0.9 Ti substitution. To achieve the separation, the cations diffuse through the crystal leaving titanium richer and titanium poorer bands called lamellae (see Figure 6.2). Exsolution is inhibited if the crystals cool rapidly so there are many metastable crystals with non-equilibrium values of titanium substitution in nature.
Exsolution is important in paleomagnetism for two reasons. First, the different compositions have very different magnetic properties. Second, the lamellae effectively reduce the magnetic crystal size which we already know has a profound influence on the magnetic stability of the mineral. An example of this is shown in Figure 6.2b in which the larger crystal is several microns in width, too large to have single domain-like magnetization, yet the smaller magnetite lamellae are indeed small enough and carry a strong stable magnetization (Feinberg et al. 2005).
Compositions of minerals are frequently plotted on ternary diagrams like the one shown in Figure 6.3. [For help in reading ternary diagrams, please see the Appendix B.1.4] The apices of the ternary diagram are Fe2+ on the lower left, Fe3+ on the lower right and Ti4+ on the top. The oxides with these species are FeO (w�stite), Fe2O3 (hematite or maghemite depending on structure) and TiO (rutile). Every point on the triangle represents a cation mixture or solution that adds up to one cation (hence the fractional formulae).
Each of the solid arrows in Figure 6.3 (labelled titanomagnetite and hemoilmenite) represent increasing substitution of titanium into the crystal lattices of magnetite and hematite respectively. The amount of Ti substitution in titanomagnetites is denoted by “x”, while substitution in the hemoilmenites is denoted by “y”. Values for x and y range from 0 (magnetite or hematite) to 1 (ulv�spinel or ilmenite).
In earlier chapters on rock magnetism, we learned a few things about magnetite. As mentioned in Chapter 4, magnetite (Fe3O4) has an inverse spinel structure (AB2O4). The oxygen atoms form a face-centered cubic lattice into which cations fit in either octahedral or tetrahedral symmetry. For each unit cell there are four tetrahedral sites (A) and eight octahedral sites (B). To maintain charge balance with the four oxygen ions (O2-), there are two Fe3+ ions and one Fe2+ ion. Fe3+ has five unpaired spins, while Fe2+ has four. As discussed in Chapter 3, each unpaired spin contributes a moment of one Bohr magneton (mb). The divalent iron ions all reside in the octahedral lattice sites, whereas the trivalent iron ions are split evenly between octahedral and tetrahedral sites: Fe3+|Fe3+Fe2+|O4. The A and B lattice sites are coupled with antiparallel spins and magnetite is ferrimagnetic. Therefore, the net moment of magnetite is (9-5=4) mb per molecule (at 0 K).
Titanomagnetites can occur as primary minerals in igneous rocks. Magnetite, as well as various members of the hemoilmenite series, can also form as a result of high temperature oxidation. In sediments, magnetite often occurs as a detrital component. It can also be produced by bacteria or authigenically during diagenesis.
Substitution of Ti4+, which has no unpaired spins (see Chapter 3), has a profound effect on the magnetic properties of the resulting titanomagnetite. Ti4+ substitutes for a trivalent iron ion. In order to maintain charge balance, another trivalent iron ion turns into a divalent iron ion. The end members of the solid solution series are:
|x = 0||x = 1|
Ulv�spinel is antiferromagnetic because the A and B lattice sites have the same net moment. When x is between 0 and 1, the mineral is called a titanomagnetite. If x is 0.6, for example, the mineral is called TM60 (green dot in Figure 6.3).
The profound effect of titanium substitution on the intrinsic properties of titanomagnetite is illustrated in Figure 6.4. Because Ti4+ has no unpaired spins, the saturation magnetization decreases with increasing x (Figure 6.4a). The cell dimensions increase with increasing x (Figure 6.4b). As a result of the increased cell dimension, there is a decrease in Curie Temperature (Figure 6.4c). There is also a slight increase in coercivity (not shown).
The large Ms of magnetite (see Table 6.1) means that for deviations from equant grains as small as 10%, the magnetic anisotropy energy becomes dominated by shape. Nonetheless, aspects of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy provide useful diagnostic tests. The magnetocrystalline anisotropy constants are a strong function of temperature. On warming to ~-100∘C from near absolute zero, changes in these constants can lead to an abrupt loss of magnetization, which is known loosely as the Verwey transition (see Chapter 4). Identification of the Verwey transition suggests a remanence that is dominated by magnetocrystalline anisotropy. As we shall see, the temperature at which it occurs is sensitive to oxidation and the transition can be completely supressed by maghemitization (see Dunlop and �zdemir ).
It should be noted that natural titanomagnetites often contain impurities (usually Al, Mg, Cr). These impurities also affect the magnetic properties. Substitution of 0.1 Al3+ into the unit cell of titanomagnetite results in a 25% reduction in Ms and a reduction of the Curie temperature by some 50∘C. Substitution of Mg2+ into TM60 also results in a lower saturation magnetization with a reduction of some 15%.
Hematite has a corundum structure (see Figure 6.5). It is rhombohedral with a pseudocleavage (perpendicular to the c axis) and tends to break into flakes. It is antiferromagnetic, with a weak parasitic ferromagnetism resulting from either spin-canting or defect ferromagnetism (see Chapter 3). Because the magnetization is a spin canted antiferromagnetism, the temperature at which this magnetization disappears is called the N�el Temperature instead of the Curie Temperature which is sensu strictu only for ferromagnetic minerals. The N�el temperature for hematite is approximately 685∘C.
Above about -10∘C (the Morin transition), the magnetization is constrained by aspects of the crystal structure to lie perpendicular to the c axis or within the basal plane. Below the Morin transition, spin-canting all but disappears and the magnetization is parallel to the c axis. This effect could be used to demagnetize the grains dominated by spin-canting: it does not affect those dominated by defect moments. Most hematites formed at low-temperatures have magnetizations dominated by defect moments, so the remanence of many rocks will not display a Morin transition.
Hematite occurs widely in oxidized sediments and dominates the magnetic properties of red beds. It occurs as a high temperature oxidation product in certain igneous rocks. Depending on grain size, among other things, it is either black (specularite) or red (pigmentary). Diagnostic properties of hematite are listed in Table 6.1.
The substitution of Ti into the lattice structure of αFe2O3 has an even more profound influence on magnetic properties than for magnetite. For y = 0 the magnetization is spin-canted antiferromagnetic, but when y = 0.45, the magnetization becomes ferrimagnetic (see Figure 6.6a). For small amounts of substitution, the Ti and Fe cations are distributed equally among the cation layers. For y > 0.45, however, the Ti cations preferentially occupy alternate cation layers. Remembering that the Ti4+ ions have no net moment, we can imagine that antiparallel coupling between the two sub-lattices results in ferrimagnetic behavior, as opposed to the equal and opposite style of anti-ferromagnetism.
Titanohematite particles with intermediate values of y have interesting properties from a paleomagnetic point of view. There is a solid solution at high temperatures, but as the temperatures drop the crystals exsolve into titanium rich and poor lamellae (see Figure 6.2d). Figure 6.6 shows the variation in saturation magnetization and N�el temperature with Ti substitution. For certain initial liquid compositions, the exolution lamellae could have Ti-rich bands alternating with Ti-poor bands. If the Ti-rich bands have higher magnetizations, yet lower Curie temperatures than the Ti-poor bands, the Ti-poor bands will become magnetized first. When the Curie temperature of the Ti-rich bands is reached, they will become magnetized in the presence of the demagnetizing field of the Ti-poor bands, hence they will acquire a remanence that is antiparallel to the applied field. Because these bands have higher magnetizations, the net NRM will also be anti-parallel to the applied field and the rock will be self-reversed. This is fortunately very rare in nature.
Many minerals form under one set of equilibrium conditions (say within a cooling lava flow) and are later subjected to a different set of conditions (sea-floor alteration or surface weathering). They will tend to alter in order to come into equilibrium with the new set of conditions. The new conditions are often more oxidizing than the original conditions and compositions tend to move along the dashed lines in Figure 6.3. The degree of oxidation is represented by the parameter z.
While the solid solution between magnetite and ulv�spinel exists in principle, intergrowths of these two minerals are actually quite rare in nature because the titanomagnetites interact with oxygen in the melt to form intergrowths of low Ti magnetite with ilmenite. This form of oxidation is known as deuteric oxidation.
Low temperature oxidation will tend to transform a single phase spinel (titanomagnetite) into a new single phase spinel (titanomaghemite) by diffusion of Fe2+ from the lattice structure of the (titano)magnetite to the surface where it is converted to Fe3+; titanomaghemite is a “cation-deficient” inverse spinel. The inset to Figure 6.7c shows a magnetite crystal in the process of becoming maghemite. The conversion of the Fe2+ ion means a loss in volume which results in characteristic cracking of the surface. There is also a loss in magnetization, a shrinkage of cell size and, along with the tightening unit cell, an increase in Curie Temperature. These trends are shown for TM60 in Figure 6.7. Maghematization results in a much reduced Verwey transition (see Figure 6.8).
The (titano)maghemite structure is metastable and can invert to form the isochemical, but more stable structure of (titano)hematite, or it can be reduced to form magnetite. The two forms of Fe2O3 are distinguished by the symbols γ for maghemite and α for hematite. Inversion of natural maghemite is usually complete by about 350∘C, but it can survive until much higher temperatures (for more details, see Dunlop and �zdemir, 1997). Also, it is common that the outer rim of the magnetite will be oxidized to maghemite, while the inner core remains magnetite.
Of the many iron oxyhydroxides that occur in any abundance in nature, goethite (αFeOOH; Figure 6.9a,b) is the most common magnetic phase. It is antiferromagnetic with what is most likely a defect magnetization. It occurs widely as a weathering product of iron-bearing minerals and as a direct precipitate from iron-bearing solutions. It is metastable under many conditions and dehydrates to hematite with time or elevated temperature. Dehydration is usually complete by about 325∘C. It is characterized by a very high coercivity but a low N�el temperature of about 100–150∘C. Diagnostic properties of goethite are listed in Table 6.1.
There are two iron-sulfides that are important to paleomagnetism: greigite (Fe3S4; Figure 6.9c,d) and pyrrhotite (Fe7S8-Fe11S12; Figure 6.9e,f). These are ferrimagnetic and occur in reducing environments. They both tend to oxidize to various iron oxides leaving paramagnetic pyrite as the sulfide component.
The Curie temperature of monoclinic pyrrhotite (Fe7S8) is about 325∘C (see Figure 6.10b; Table 6.1). Monoclinic pyrrhotite undergoes a transition at ~ 35 K, so low temperature measurements can be diagnostic for this phase (see Figure 6.10a). Hexagonal pyrrhotite undergoes a structural transition from an imperfect antiferromagnet to a ferromagnet with much higher saturation magnetization at about 200∘C. During a thermomagnetic experiment, the expansion of the crystal results in a large peak in magnetization just below the Curie Temperature (see Figure 6.10c). Mixtures of monoclinic and hexagonal pyrrhotite result in the behavior sketched in Figure 6.10d. The maximum unblocking temperature of greigite is approximately 330∘C. Other diagnostic properties of greigite and pyrrhotite are listed in Table 6.1.
The composition and relative proportions of FeTi oxides, crystallizing from a silicate melt depend on a number of factors, including the bulk chemistry of the melt, oxygen fugacity and the cooling rate. The final assemblage may be altered after cooling. FeTi oxides are generally more abundant in mafic volcanic rocks (e.g. basalts) than silicic lavas (e.g., rhyolites). FeTi oxides can be among the first liquidus phases (~ 1000∘C) in silicic melts, but in mafic lavas they generally are among the last phases to form (~1050∘C), often with plagioclase and pyroxene.
Although there is considerable variability, the Ti (ulv�spinel) content of the titanomagnetite crystallizing from a melt generally is lower in more silicic melts (see solid black lines in Figure 6.11). Titanomagnetites in tholeiitic lavas generally have 0.5 < x < 0.8 with an initial composition near TM60 (x=0.6) characteristic for much of the oceanic crust. The range of rhombohedral phases (dashed red lines) crystallizing from silicate melts is more limited, 0.05 < y < 0.3 for most lavas.
The final magnetic mineral assemblage in a rock is often strongly influenced by the cooling rate and oxygen fugacity during initial crystallization. As a first approximation, we distinguish slowly cooled rocks (which may undergo solid state exsolution and/or deuteric oxidation) from those in which the oxide minerals were rapidly quenched. As mentioned before, FeTi oxides in slowly cooled igneous rocks can exhibit exolution lamellae with bands of low and high titanium magnetites if the oxygen fugacity remains unoxidizing. This reaction is very slow, so its effects are rarely seen in nature.
The typical case in slowly cooled rocks is that the system becomes more oxidizing with increasing differentiation during cooling and crystallization. For example, both the dissociation of magmatic water and the crystallization of silicate phases rich in Fe will act to increase the oxidation state. This will drive compositions to higher z values (see Figure 6.3). The final assemblage typically consists of ilmenite lamellae and a nearly pure magnetite host because adding O2 drives the reaction Fe2TiO4 + O2 ⇌ Fe3O4 to the right. This process is known as oxyexsolution. Under even more oxidizing conditions, these phases may ultimately be replaced by their more oxidized counterparts (e.g., hematite, pseudobrookite).
Weathering at ambient surface conditions or mild hydrothermal alteration may lead to the development of cation deficient (titano)maghemites. This can either occur by addition of oxygen to the spinel phase with a corresponding oxidation of the Fe2+ to Fe3+ to maintain charge balance, or by the removal of some of the octahedral iron from the crystal structure.
Igneous (and metamorphic) rocks are the ultimate source for the components of sedimentary rocks, but biological and low-temperature diagenetic agents work to modify these components and have a significant effect on magnetic mineralogy in sediments. As a result there is a virtual rainbow of magnetic mineralogies found in sediments. (Titano)magnetite coming into the sedimentary environment from an igneous source may experience a change in pH and redox conditions that make it no longer the stable phase, hence it may alter. Also, although the geochemistry of seawater is generally oxidizing with respect to the stability field of magnetite, pronounced changes in the redox state of sediments often occur with increasing depth as a function of the breakdown of organic carbon. Such changes may result in locally strongly reducing environments where magnetite may be dissolved and authigenic sulfides produced. Indeed, changes down sediment cores in the ferrimagnetic mineral content and porewater geochemistry suggest that this process is active in some (most?) marine sedimentary sequences. For example, dissolution of magnetite and/or production of non-magnetic sulfides may be responsible for the oft-seen decrease in various bulk magnetic parameters (e.g., magnetic susceptibility, IRM, ARM, etc.) with depth.
Some of the more spectacular magnetic minerals found in sediments are biogenic magnetites produced by magnetotactic bacteria (see recent review by Kopp and Kirsch- vink, 2008 and Figure 6.12). The sizes and shapes of bacterial magnetite, when plotted on the Evans diagram from Chapter 4, suggest that magnetotactic bacteria form magnetite in the single domain grain size range – otherwise extremely rare in nature. It appears that bacterial magnetites are common in sediments, but their role in contributing to the natural remanence is still poorly understood.
|Density = 5197 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Curie temperature = 580∘C||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Saturation Magnetization = 92 Am2kg-1||O’Reilly |
|Anisotropy Constant = -2.6 Jkg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Volume susceptibility = ~ 1 SI||O’Reilly |
|Typical coercivities are 10’s of mT||O’Reilly |
|Verwey transition: 110-120 K||�zdemir and Dunlop |
|Cell edge = 0.8396 nm||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Density = 5074 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Curie temperature = 590-675∘C||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Saturation Magnetization = 74 Am2kg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Anisotropy Constant = 0.92 Jkg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Verwey transition: suppressed||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Breaks down to αFe2O3: between 250→ 750∘C||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Density = 4939 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Curie temperature = 150∘C||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Saturation Magnetization = 24 Am2kg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Anisotropy Constant = 0.41 Jkg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Coercivity ~ 8 mT||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Verwey transition: suppressed||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Cell edge = 0.8482 nm||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Density = 5271 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|N�el temperature = 675∘C||O’Reilly |
|Saturation Magnetization = 0.4 Am2kg-1||O’Reilly |
|Anisotropy Constant = 228 Jkg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Volume susceptibility = ~ 1.3 x 10-3 SI||O’Reilly |
|Coercivities vary widely and can be 10’s of teslas||Banerjee |
|Morin Transition: ~ 250-260 K (for > 0.2 μm)||O’Reilly |
|Density = 4264 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|N�el temperature: 70 → 125∘C||O’Reilly |
|Saturation Magnetization = 10-3 → 1 Am2kg-1||O’Reilly |
|Anisotropy Constant = 0.25 → 2 Jkg-1||Dekkers |
|Volume susceptibility = ~ 1 x 10-3 SI||Dekkers [1989a]|
|Coercivities can be 10’s of teslas|
|Breaks down to hematite: 250 → 400∘C|
|Density = 4662 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Curie temperature = ~ 325∘C||Dekkers |
|Curie temperature = ~270∘C||Dekkers |
|Saturation Magnetization = 0.4 -~ 20 Am2kg-1||Worm et al. |
|Volume susceptibility = ~ 1 x 10-3 → 1 SI||Collinson ;O’Reilly |
|Anisotropy Constant = 20 Jkg-1||O’Reilly |
|Coercivities vary widely and can be 100’s of mT||O’Reilly |
|Has a transition at ~ 34 K||Dekkers et al. |
|Rochette et al. |
|Hexagonal pyrrotite: transition near 200∘|
|Breaks down to magnetite: ~ 500∘C||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Density = 4079 kg m-3||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Maximum unblocking temperature = ~ 330∘C||Roberts |
|Saturation Magnetization = ~ 25 Am2kg-1||Spender et al. |
|Anisotropy Constant = -0.25 Jkg-1||Dunlop and �zdemir |
|Coercivity 60→> 100 mT||Roberts |
|Has high Mr∕χ ratios ~ 70 x 103 Am-1||Snowball and Thompson |
|Breaks down to magnetite: ~ 270-350∘C||Roberts |
SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS: Dunlop and �zdemir (1997), Chapter 3; Kopp and Kirschvink (2008).
You measured Curie Temperature curves for two samples A and B as shown in Figure 6.13. Based on your knowledge of Curie Temperatures, what is the likely magnetic mineralogy for each sample?
The data in demag.dat in the Chapter_6 data directory (see Problems for Chapter 5 for downloading instructions) are thermal demagnetization data for a specimen that had a 2 T field exposed along x, a 0.4 T field exposed along y and a 0.12 T field exposed along z. The sample was then heated to a particular temperature step (∘C) and cooled in zero magnetic field, allowing all grains that become superparamagnetic at temperatures lower than the treatment temperature to become randomized. After each treatment step, the magnetic vector was measured. The column headings are: Treatment temperature (C), Intensity, Declination, Inclination.
a) Write a python program to read the data in and convert the declination, inclination and intensity to cartesian components.
b) Modify your program to normalize the intensity to the 20∘C measurement.
c) Extend the program to plot the x and y components as a function of temperature.
d) Based on your understanding of coercivity and Curie temperatures, what is carrying the x and y components?
Ferromagnetic minerals in two rock samples are known to be FeTi oxides and are found to have the properties described below. Using this information and looking up the properties of FeTi oxides described in the text, identify the ferromagnetic minerals. For titanomagnetite or titanohematite, approximate the compositional parameter x.
a.) Strong-field thermomagnetic analysis indicates a dominant Curie temperature Tc = 420∘C. Subjecting the specimen to increasingly larger fields to measure successive isothermal remanences (see Chapter 5) reveals a coercivity spectrum with a coercivity of less than 300 mT. What is this ferromagnetic mineral?
b) Strong-field thermomagnetic analysis (used for measuring the Curie temperature) shows the behavior in Figure 6.14a with Curie temperature Tc = 200∘C. In addition, electron microprobe data indicates abundances of FeO, Fe2O3, and TiO shown in Figure 6.14b. Unfortunately, electron microprobe data are not very effective in determining the Fe2O3:FeO ratio (placement from left to right in the TiO-FeO-Fe2O3 ternary diagram). Accordingly, there is much uncertainty in the Fe2O3:FeO ratio indicated by the microprobe data. But microprobe data are effective in determining the TiO:(Fe2O3 + FeO) ratio (placement from bottom to top in the TiO-FeO-Fe2O3 ternary diagram). With this information, identify the ferromagnetic mineral.