EarthRef.org Reference Database (ERR)
Development and Maintenance by the EarthRef.org Database Team

Detailed Reference Information
Stark et al. 1986
Stark, P.B., Parker, R.L., Masters, G. and Orcutt, J.A. (1986). Strict bounds on seismic velocity in the spherical earth. Journal of Geophysical Research 91: doi: 10.1029/JB080i014p13892. issn: 0148-0227.

We address the inverse problem of finding the smallest envelope containing all velocity profiles consistent with a finite set of imprecise &tgr;(p) data from spherical earth. Traditionally, the problem has been attacked after mapping the data relations into relations on an equivalent flat earth. Of the two contemporary direct methods for finding bounds on velocities in the flat earth consistent with uncertain &tgr;(p) data, a nonlinear (NL) approah descended from the Herglotz-Wiechert inversion and a linear programming (LP) approach, only NL has been used to solve the spherical earth problem. On the basis of the finite collection of &tgr;(p) measurements alone, NL produces an envelope that is too narrow: there are numerous physically acceptable models that satisfy the data and violate the NL bounds, primarily because the NL method requires continuous functions as bounds on &tgr;(p) and thus data must be fabricated between measured values by some sort of interpolation. We use the alternative LP approach, which does not require interpolation, to place optimal bounds on the velocity in the core.

The resulting velocity corridor is disappointingly wide, and we therefore seek reasonable physical assumptions about the earth to reduce the range of permissible models. We argue from thermodynamic relations that P wave velocity decreases with distance from the earth's center within the outer core and quite probably within the inner core and lower mantle. We also show that the second derivative of velocity with respect to radius is probably not positive in the core. The first radial derivative constraint is readily incorporated into LP. The second derivative constraint is nonlinear and can not be implemented exactly with LP; however, geometrical arguements enables us to apply a weak form of the constraint without any additional computation. LP inversions of core &tgr;(p) data using the first radial derivative constraint give new, extremely tight bounds on the P wave velocity in the core. The weak second derivative constraint improves them slightly.

BACKGROUND DATA FILES

Abstract

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research
http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/
Publisher
American Geophysical Union
2000 Florida Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20009-1277
USA
1-202-462-6900
1-202-328-0566
service@agu.org
Click to clear formClick to return to previous pageClick to submit