Paleomagnetic samples were collected from late Neogene basalt flows from Thailand. All of these flows are horizontal and are relatively unaltered in thin section. These rocks possess a stable magnetization which is believed to be primary. Samples from 48 lava flows were collected from sites located within the Khorat Plateau, the Chao Phraya-Phitsanulok Basin and the mountainous terrane west of the Chao Phraya-Phitsanulok Basin. These data were combined with previously reported late Neogene data from five flows from western Thailand. Although the average inclination from the 53 sites is indistinguishable from the expected dipole inclination, the average declination has a net clockwise rotation of 13.5¿¿5.8¿ from the geocentric dipole field. Furthermore, the mean declination values from the 29 flows from the Khorat Plateau are indistinguishable from the present dipole field direction (Dm=4.3¿7.5¿) and indistinguishable from the mean declination from 28 late Neogene volcanic flows from Vietnam. In contrast, the mean declinations from 24 flows collected from central and western Thailand are deflected significantly clockwise (Dm=24.4¿¿7.7¿) from the geocentric dipole field direction.

The differential rotation between western and central Thailand versus the Khorat Plateau suggests that Indochina is composed of at least two structural blocks which underwent a different rotational history. These observations, when combined with geologic and geophysical data from the Chao Phraya-Phitsanulok Basin, Gulf of Thailand, and the intermontane basins of western Thailand, suggest that the rotations are recording a late Neogene phase of E-W extension of these basins. We suggest that the formation of these basins and the related volcanism developed in response to subduction of the Indian plate under western Burma. We envision the tectonics of this region is similar in style to the Basin and Range region of the western United States. Last, we have observed field relationships from some of the Rhyolites located in the central basin. Although these rhyolites are reported to be Mesozoic or Paleozoic in age, our field observations and a K-Ar age data show that at least some of these rhyolites are younger than the basalts. We suggest that the rhyolites form a bimodal suite with the basaltic rocks which were erupted in the later stages of the extension. ¿ American Geophysical Union 1988