Two different spectroscopic techniques for measuring atmospheric concentrations of formaldehyde were compared during a 6-week field study in the mountains 17 km west of Boulder, Colorado, in August and September 1993. A long-path ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) absorption spectrometer and an IR tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer (TDLAS) were the two instruments employed. The former measured ambient formaldehyde levels over a 10.3 km open path (20.6 km total path) extending between Fritz Peak Observatory and Idaho Hill, while the latter measured in situ levels at the Idaho Hill site. In addition to utilizing different spectral regions, both instruments employed different sampling and calibration approaches. Because of the closer proximity to anthropogenic sources the long-path UV/V is instrument generally detected higher formaldehyde concentrations than the TDLAS system at all times during the day. Averaged over the entire study for all wind regimes, the former resulted in formaldehyde concentrations 15% higher than the latter. The mean and median formaldehyde concentration measured by both instruments was around 1.5 ppbv and individual 5-min averages varied from a maximum of about 5 ppbv down to levels 0.6 ppbv. However, during periods of strong westerly flow where anthropogenic and meteorological influences are minimized, both techniques were in agreement to within 5%. This regime, which constitutes 19% of the total mutual data set, resulted in a continental background formaldehyde concentration of 0.92¿0.16 ppbv. The present instrument comparison thus bridges the gap in formaldehyde instrument comparison studies between those in the background free troposphere and those in polluted urban regimes. In addition to providing further confidence in both measurement techniques, the present comparison study also provided a valuable data set necessary for advancing our understanding of tropospheric oxidation mechanisms. A set of guidelines for future comparisons of long-path and in situ measurements of formaldehyde at this site are also discussed.¿ 1997 American Geophysical Union